This web-site contains two main
things, picture recognition software. It is used mainly for organising your pictures with tags and uses picture recognition to attempt
to group those pictures.
Secondly we have a legal research section on
this web-site that allows Solicitors, Companies, Charities, Self-Employed to
ask a legal research question. Sometimes if asked an interesting
question, we provide a free answer to a legal research question. If for
instance you're on some form of Universal Credits. We do this for
people mostly who are for example going to say a unemployment tribunal and
who can not get basic legal advice. Most people loose these type of
appeals because they think about what is naturally a fair thing, but
unfortunately the law is not always fair.
GPRSG - Picture Recognition Software
General Picture Recognition Software Package - Go to the Download Page and
try our Picture Recognition Software out. There are two version, the
home is £0.99 pence and the Professional is £9.99. The pro version
really does have so many nice features. It basically allows you to tag
and organize your pictures using Picture Recognition.
- ask a question or download our free legal research software called:
lawaiviewer. It is the type of software that professional solicitors use
when they do legal research.
No Signing into our software.
Private information like E-Mails taken.
No Tacking within the Software
No Location Data Taken within our Software
No Advertising within the
Basically you can download our software and we do not know
who you are because we believe in absolute privacy.
Legal Research and Software Home Page
My General Blog
or Artificial Intelligence
This is just interesting blog of the
type of hardware I would like to see available for improving legal research
Privacy Statement We also support
https://duckduckgo.com/ this search
engine protects cookies privacy.
New Dark Age of
Surveillance - This Bill Must Be Stopped
This all started back in
2000 when the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 became
legislation. Now we have the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal
Conduct) Bill - see
https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2783l , this is very likely
going to become law with some frightening consequences.
What is concerning
about this new bill is the amount of public authorities than can now commit
a crime and no longer be held responsible. Yes I said it right they
can now "Commit A Crime" and if they are doing surveillance get away with
You may think, that in certain circumstances where an MI5
officers life was in danger it maybe acceptable for the supreme court to
state in exceptional circumstances that they had to do a criminal wrong to
look as if they are part of a criminal group. But to put into
legislation that committing a crime while at work is acceptable is going too
But we seem to be passing legislation that gives most public
authorities permission to commit a crime. Will this be abused the
simple answer is YES, human nature is usually one of, if we can get away
with it we will.
AMNESTY SAY this new bill does not prevent torture.
MI5 - Understandable
but let the courts decide.
Police Force and National Crime Agency - Amazing those who protect against
crime can now commit a crime.
Immigration Officers - Simply Why
Customs and Revenue - Ridiculous just unbelievable
UK Military - Why
Ministry of Justice (Relations to Prison) -Why
Lots more but to name just
Environment Agency, Financial Conduct Authority, just to name some. Again
If you have nothing to hide then you should not be concerned about privacy.
This is a commonly used phrase, and one of the most dangerous phrases in
existence. Privacy is a fundamental human right, which we have given
away in law see the UK Investigatory Powers Act 2016 if you wish to see how
much we have lost our privacy.
Now Public Authorities can bug your
home, record video of you and your family including your children. walking
around your house in whatever state of dress any family member maybe in.
They can listen into your most private conversations with your wife, they
can listen into your bedroom talk. They can easily see every thing you
watch on television or YouTube or any digital communications, even if
If you agree with the statement, if you have
nothing to hide then you should not be concerned about privacy. Then
therefore put several recording devices all around your home include video
apart from the bathroom and then without any editing put it up on YouTube
once a month for about 6 years. Then you will understand how someone
feels who is under Surveillance.
What is even more interesting is
that if you suspect that you are under Surveillance you really have no where
to turn. A Court will not tell you if you are under Surveillance by a
You probably will never no what form of
surveillance is carried out against you.
Changing the Law -
I am not apposed or against certain types of Surveillance. However I
think some surveillance should just be banned all together. Surveillance while in
your own home should be banned outright. No microphones no video just ban
surveillance in someone's home. Trust me I know this is going on.
Put very strict time limits on surveillance.
The whole point of
Surveillance is to collect evidence, for a criminal conviction. At
trial all surveillance used should be admissible this should not exclude any
surveillance, if so, that surveillance should not be used in court but the
overall time of surveillance should be admissible in court.
the person under surveillance was cleared of a crime he was under
surveillance for he should be compensated and a written apology made by the
public authority that had that person under surveillance.
person was under surveillance and that surveillance has ended for 12 months
the person under surveillance should be compensated and a written letter of
apology sent to him.
All contents of surveillance should be destroyed
after 12 months of surveillance stopping.
Compensation should start at £5,000 pounds for each month
that person was under surveillance. You may ask why so much, well apart from
a total loss of privacy for a person under surveillance and their family. It would be a deterrent from any public
authority to continue to use surveillance if they could not show that it
would lead to a conviction.
My final point if anybody used
surveillance against another person at some point they would find something
that they have done that would cause a Civil or Criminal wrong. Even if
it's driving over the 30 mile an our speed limit. If you had surveillance in
your car you could possible be track enough times that when you have broken the
speed limit so many times, to be disqualify from driving a car. This brings me back to my
It is the people who are carrying out the surveillance
who have all the power. Let us all rewrite the law on
Please feel free to copy this page onto your web-site
if you feel like me that Britain is becoming a surveillance state.